Semantic Fidelity Paper Series: AI Systems and Reality Drift

This page collects the AI Systems and Reality Drift Notes, a series of short concept papers on how AI systems, organizations, metrics, and institutions can remain coherent, useful, and operational while gradually losing alignment with the realities they were built to represent.

The series connects established terms such as hallucination, grounding, faithfulness, RAG, benchmark overfitting, model monitoring, Goodhart’s Law, Campbell’s Law, principal-agent problems, mission drift, and semantic similarity to the broader Reality Drift framework.

The central pattern is that representations can keep working inside a system while becoming less answerable to the reality, meaning, evidence, or purpose they were created to preserve.

Part I: AI Evaluation, Monitoring, and Reliability

Part II: Grounding, Retrieval, and Meaning Preservation

Part III: Metrics, Incentives, and Organizational Drift

Part IV: Conceptual Foundations

  • The Map-Territory Distinction and Semantic Fidelity (PDF)
    Uses the map-territory distinction to explain why representations simplify reality, why that simplification is useful, and how maps, models, metrics, and AI outputs can lose contact with what they represent.

Related Framework Concepts

Semantic Fidelity Resources:

Core Concepts: